posted by:
|
Paul Black
on March 4, 2000
at 6:37AM
|
subject:
|
Responses
|
Thanks for the messages from Joel Blutfield and Joan Gilbert. I interpret their concern as about how to encourage teachers to start to change both practices and beliefs. Our experience in UK has been to offer a few tactics - ideas such as those listed in the bullet points near the end of my talk (see the Resources section), and particularly those which help the students to have a stronger voice. We have found that once teachers make a modest start down this road, the more active involvement of the students serves both to encourage them and to open their eyes - to how willing their students are to have their ideas taken seriously, and to the new lessons they learn aboout their students thinking. Thanks to Richard Mathews for the list of sources for good questions. I think it might be helpful to share such information (with access details), so others can access them. It would also help to share and so clarify our ideas of quality - what makes a good question. This could be explored if people could offer (say) just one favourite example with an explanation of why it works well. Some questions, when tried with students, produce replies which really show up their needs in concept thinking. My example is from Lillian McDermott's work which she used at the conference. My memory of her question is that it set out three electric circuits each with a battery connected to (1) one bulb (2) two bulbs in series (3) two bulbs in parallel. The task was to put the bulbs in order of expected brightness and explain why (assuming identical bulbs and a perfect battery). This is a taxing question - surprisingly - at all levels up to graduate students. It is the demand for qualitative explanation (not numerical calculations) which exposes basic misconceptions about current being used up, about batteries providing a fixed current only, which has to be shared for parallel arms, and so on. This is a really revealing question and can provoke rich peer discussion. So I put it here as my current favourite - what's yours ? Richard mentions searching for an external summative evaluation. I'm not clear whether he means a program evaluation or a test of the students' understanding. If it is the latter, I come back with a question: cna one bring in a ready-made test from outside for summative purposes, or does one have to craft one which will match with and reinforce the formative practice?
|
|