Discussion: Middle school curriculum reform: What is your growing edge?

posted by: Brian Drayton on June 7, 1999 at 12:33PM subject: Deep change? A couple of posts so far have alluded to structural changes that might be needed to enable or permit pedagogical reforms. Another topic raised was, what to do when the project ends, with the teacher leaders. Others have spoken about "real" middle-school vs "faux" middle schools (my terms!). It seems to me that strutural changes like these are pivotal for any lasting change. Has your LSC (or some other project that you know about) addressed this level of issue? For me, this is to raise the question, What does "systemic" mean in "systemic change"?

Thread View

• Welcome from the moderator - posted by Joni Falk on 04/26/99 - 01:56
  • Hello - posted by Scott Hays on 04/26/99 - 07:01
  • Intro - posted by Susan (Sinkinson) Elko on 04/27/99 - 05:20
  • MS Curriculum Reform - posted by Christine Salcito on 04/30/99 - 02:55
  • Hi from MSI - posted by Bob Box on 05/03/99 - 06:09
  • Moving the discussion forward: - posted by Joni Falk on 05/09/99 - 05:28
  • Moving Forward - posted by Scott Hays on 05/10/99 - 05:40
  • silent member - posted by Sabra Lee on 05/10/99 - 04:04
  • RE: Welcome from the moderator - posted by Rebecca Montano on 05/12/99 - 11:20
  • middle school reform: structure or style? - posted by Bob Box on 05/13/99 - 02:08
  • Continuing the conversation: - posted by Joni Falk on 06/01/99 - 03:32
  • Re: lsc-middle-school Digest for 1 Jun 1999 (fwd) - posted by Barbara Sullivan on 06/02/99 - 01:30
  • Re: Continuing the conversation: - posted by Sabra Lee on 06/02/99 - 02:51
  •   Deep change? - posted by Brian Drayton on 06/07/99 - 12:33  
  • "Deep Change" - posted by Barbara Sullivan on 06/08/99 - 09:46